The way I think team production and
gift exchange applies most to my life is when I participate in group projects.
Group projects are often assigned to use your knowledge and other team members’
to share knowledge and expertise equally and split the work down the middle,
which creates a better end result for the project. Sounds like a great idea in
theory, much like the idea of sharing the marbles in Jonathan Haidt’s article.
Ideally, the people who do more work in a group project reap more of the
benefits just like Haidt suggests in his article in regards to the marbles, but
unfortunately, as I have experienced, that is not how it always works out.
I never realized there was a term
to describe the team member who does less work and gets the credit until I took
an AP Psychology class in high school. The term is “social loafing”, and it is
the urge we get to do less work when we know we can get the benefits regardless
of how much work we put in. There are ways to combat this issue in group
projects, as I have had some teachers
who have allowed for us to grade our team members anonymously so they can know
if some kids are not doing the same amount of work. Ideas like these help
eliminate social loafing, but it is still inevitable in some other situations.
Perhaps teachers instituting ways
to grade team members in group projects helps eliminate social loafing, but I
have experienced it on sports teams as well. When I was in 8th grade, my
baseball team won our championship. We were all ecstatic, but we had one team
member who showed up to few practices and wasn’t involved in most of our wins.
However, he still came to our team party and received a championship trophy
like the rest of us. He gets to call himself a champion, but he really loafed
through the entire season. At the end of the day, all he cared about was being
able to say he won a championship, so the payoff still worked out in his favor.
I am not saying I think this way,
but some people want to look back at their lives nd see what they have accrued
as opposed to what they have done along the way. They are unconcerned with the
hard work that goes into getting straight A’s or winning a sports championship
or making lots of money, they just want to be able to brag about what they have
accomplished. In the marble scenario, both parties are equally concerned with
the work they put into something and what they get out. I think this is
unrealistic, because some people will be much more concerned with what they get
out than what they put in.
I
think about half the time, teams have members who are good people care about
the work that goes into an A or the practices that go into winning. In these
cases, the success at the end is sweeter, because everyone involved really
cared about the project or season. The other half of the time, the people who
have to do more work end up being slightly bitter at the end even though they
experienced success. This relates to the economy because at the end of the day,
everyone is out for themselves. In the workplace, people will do less work if
they know they get the same payday at the end of the week. This can cause
anything from the downfall of a small project or an entire business.